Did Biden Dismiss Uighur Genocide During His Town Hall?
No. A New York Post article misrepresents what Biden said.
 |
An article from the New York Post accused President Joe Biden of shrugging off human rights violations and genocide in China and embracing cultural relativism to downplay concerns. The headline: “Biden Dimisses Uighur genocide as part of China’s ‘different norms’.”
The article is based on comments Biden made during a CNN town hall in Wisconsin on Tuesday. The Post article begins:
President Biden is dismissing the genocide against the Uighur population in China, dubbing the mass internment a ‘different norm’ — despite the State Department this month responding to ‘atrocities’ in the camps, following reports of systemic rape and torture.”
The commander in chief made the remarks after being asked during the CNN town hall Tuesday evening about his recent conversation with his Chinese counterpart, starting his response by relaying Xi’s justification for the abuses.
That reporting is false. Biden did not begin his answer with Xi’s justification for the abuses. Instead, Biden started by citing the moral imperative the U.S. has to condemn such abuses. He followed with an explanation of his understanding of Xi’s motives—what the Post characterized as Biden’s dismissal—and punctuated his comment by reiterating his obligation as president to speak for American values. The initial exchange follows (and you can read the whole transcript here):
CNN host Anderson Cooper: What about the Uighurs? What about human rights abuses in China?
BIDEN: The Uighurs. We must speak up for human rights. It's who we are. We can't — my comment to him was — and I know him well, and he knows me well. We're — a two-hour conversation.
COOPER: You talked about this to him?
BIDEN: I talked about this too.
And that's not so much refugee, but I talked about it. I said, look — Chinese leaders, if you know anything about Chinese history, … the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven't been unified at home.
So, the central — to vastly overstate it, the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that. I point out to him, no American president can be sustained as a president if he doesn't reflect the values of the United States.
The author, Emily Jacobs, then claims that Biden proclaimed his intention to avoid speaking out against China’s abuses and aggression. She wrote: “Biden continued in his response that he is ‘not going to speak out against’ the Chinese Communist Party's belligerent actions in Hong Kong, against the Uighurs, or in Taiwan.”
In fact, Biden plainly conveyed the opposite meaning, suggesting it was preposterous to think that he’d remain silent in the face of China’s behavior.
After pointing to his obligation to speak out against human rights abuses and to “reflect the values of the United States,” Biden said: “And so the idea that I am not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uighurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan — trying to end the one China policy by making it forceful, I said—by the way, he said he gets it.”
(An earlier version of the article appears to have misrepresented Biden more flagrantly, attributing to the president an unsaid “is” to misconstrue the meaning of what Biden actually said. Compare the accurate, verbatim transcription above to the the original, inaccurate version here: “And so the idea is that I am not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uighurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan — trying to end the one China policy by making it forceful… [Xi] gets it.”)
The Post article also falsely claims that Biden “sidestepped” a question from Anderson Cooper about whether China will face repercussions for its human rights abuses.
In fact, Biden explicitly—and without qualification—promised repercussions for China’s human rights abuses. The exchange:
COOPER: When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? Or is there any actual repercussions for China?
BIDEN: Well, there will be repercussions for China. And he knows that.
What I'm doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other agencies that have an impact on their attitude. China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries.
And as long as they're engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it's going to be hard for them to do that. But it's much more complicated than that. I'm — I shouldn't try to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.
If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.
| 32 | 27 |
Your fact check left out the concerning parts.
"BIDEN: The Uyghurs.
We must speak up for human rights. It's who we are. We can't -- my comment to him was -- and I know him well, and he knows me well. We're -- a two-hour conversation.
COOPER: You talked about this to him?
BIDEN: I talked about this too.
And that's not so much refugee, but I talked about it. I said, look -- Chinese leaders, if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been the time China when has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven't been unified at home.
So, the central -- to vastly overstate it, the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China. And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that. I point out to him, no American president can be sustained as a
president if he doesn't reflect the values of the United States. And so the idea I'm not going to speak out against what he's doing in Hong Kong, what he's doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China, and Taiwan, trying to end the One-China policy by making it forceful, I said -- by the way, he said he gets it.
Culturally, there are different norms that each country and their leaders are expected to follow. But my point was that, when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president -- and that's how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu -- not a joke -- his predecessor, President Hu, and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another, because he was going to the president.
And I came back and said, they're going to end their one-child policy, because they're so xenophobic, they won't let anybody else in. And more people are retired than working. How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?"
I mean he is mostly incoherent but I certainly think it is more than fair to say he seems to be saying politically I have to complain when he commits genocide and XI gets it so he is fine that I am going to complain about it. We have different norms.
As far as the repercussions Biden couldn't be more clear that he will be all talk and no action. He also shows he is out of touch.
"BIDEN: Well, there will be repercussions for China. And he knows that.
What I'm doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other agencies that have an impact on their attitude. China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries.
And as long as they're engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it's going to be hard for them to do that. But it's much more complicated than that. I'm — I shouldn't try to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here."
I'm sure China is worried you will continue to be a "spokesperson" for human rights. I mean China is very afraid of "spokespeople"! Biden better back off a bit don't you think? Oh wait didn't Joe Biden just say earlier that Xi "gets it"? He gets it, Biden will complain because he has to if he wants to get re-elected but no hard feelings this is just different norms. Yes that is pretty almost verbatim what he said even though it was intermixed with gibberish.
"China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker. And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries."
Guess what Joe? China is *already* a world leader. They controlled and continue to control WHO they are on the UN human rights council and have at least as much influence with those countries. Bolivia, China, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, France, Gabon, Malawi, Mexico, Nepal, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Senegal, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan.
Biden is a complete imbecile if he doesn't see China is *already* a world power. If Biden is announcing he is just going to be a "spokesman" he is indeed essentially greenlighting all of their evil actions.
This sounded bad and looked bad. You can parse exactly what he might have meant in a positive way, but it is irritating that as much as I hated Trump, he never, ever got the benefit of the doubt in his comments. Had Trump said this, it would have been the front page of every mainstream newspaper in America, but instead, only the NY Post wrote about it in any meaningful critical way. They may have overstated his comments, but the silence from the rest of the press is deafening.