Does Amy Coney Barrett Want to ‘End the Separation of Church and State’?
There is no evidence to support the claim.
| Alec Dent | Sep 24 | 29 | 28 |
A viral tweet claims that Judge Amy Coney Barrett has said her end goal is “to end separation of church and state & build a ‘Kingdom of God’ in the United States.” The tweet has also gone viral on Facebook and Instagram, where it has received 2 million views across various public repostings.
Barrett is thought to be one of President Trump’s top choices to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, and she has earned detractors on the left for her Catholicism and for her reported association with a charismatic Christian community called the People of Praise. During Barrett’s confirmation hearings for her appointment to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, Sen. Dianne Feinstein made headlines for expressing concerns over Barrett’s religious views and telling Barrett “the dogma lives loudly within you. And that’s of concern.”
Despite what’s claimed in the viral tweet, however, Barrett has not expressed an interest in ending the separation of church and state. When asked about her faith’s role in her judicial responsibilities during the 2017 confirmation hearings, Barrett stated: “It's never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions, whether they derive from faith or anywhere else on the law” and that neither her church affiliation or religious views “would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge.” She further said that she would recuse herself if a conflict ever arose between her judicial duties and her faith.
The tweet’s mention of “build a ‘Kingdom of God’ in the United States” is an allusion to comments Barrett made in a 2006 commencement address at the University of Notre Dame Law School where Barrett was a faculty member from 2002 until 2017. Barrett told the graduating class:
“I’m just going to identify one way in which I hope that you, as graduates of Notre Dame, will fulfill the promise of being a different kind of lawyer. And that is this: that you will always keep in mind that your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God. You know the same law, are charged with maintaining the same ethical standards, and will be entering the same kinds of legal jobs as your peers across the country. But if you can keep in mind that your fundamental purpose in life is not to be a lawyer, but to know, love, and serve God, you truly will be a different kind of lawyer.”
Barrett appears to use “building the kingdom of God” and “serving God” interchangeably, and following the above paragraph explains to the audience what she meant by “being a different kind of lawyer, one who treats his or her career as a means to the end of serving God rather than an end in itself,” offering “three concrete suggestions” for how to do so. None of the suggestions imply a desire for theocracy. The first suggestion was to pray about career choices before making them. The second was to tithe 10 percent of one’s income to “the church, charitable causes, and to friends and acquaintances who need it” as “Tithing will help you remember that your career and the money you earn shouldn’t be directed just toward your own betterment but ought to be directed, in a tangible way, toward the common good.” And the third suggestion was for members of the graduating class to “seek out friends with whom you can share your faith.”
When asked for comment, Paul Browne, vice president of public affairs and communications at the University of Notre Dame, told The Dispatch Fact Check that “There is no record at Notre Dame of Professor Amy Barrett advocating the end of separation of church and state.”
If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.
| 29 | 28 |
Somehow, "that you will always keep in mind that your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God" seems a lot less scary coming from Amy Coney Barrett's mouth than it would from, say, the Falwells of the world. When someone of Barrett's background says it, I'm reminded of the Hebrew phrase "tikkun olam", repairing the world to better reflect God's justice, rather than imposing a theocracy.
Maybe the fact that I feel this way just reflects my own biases. Well-educated, urbane Christians who seem willing to recuse themselves as necessary strike me as the antidote to, rather than the enablers of, machismo-sodden "tough" culture-war Christianity, where Jesus = John Wayne and anyone not with us is against us. "Tough Christianity" that treats outgroup members not as deserving equal dignity as children of the same God but as enemies to be owned is the real problem, or so I think. It's possible to be deeply conservative in your favored religious practice but still not a flaming culture warrior, and I think Barret is like that (more so than The Kav, despite or maybe even because Kav was the heartier partier). Or, at least I hope she is.
Sign up to like comment
It is important to understand that a Judge doing her job is not a sin under Catholic teaching. The Catholic Church does not recognize divorce. That does not mean it is a sin for a judge to grant a divorce under the law. In fact, it would be a sin for a judge to mislead people saying the law doesn't allow for a divorce when she knows it does.
Scalia was I understand a faithful Catholic. He surely knew the clear Catholic teaching that Capital punishment was wrong - except in extremely rare circumstance that do not exist in the US. He was asked whether capital punishment violates the constitution. It would have been a sin for him to say it violated the constitution if he believed it really didn't.
The same is true with ACB our faith requires that we be honest. If we are asked if New York law, or the constitution allows for an abortion and we believe it does then we are required to say that it does, or we sin.
ACB graduated from Notre Dame Law School a year after I did. I know she understands these teachings as ND Law is a small school and we likely had many of the same professors.
Sign up to like comment